All work
Case study · CEO & Co-founder · 2025–26

Buy Bitcoin now, pay over time. No price-based liquidation.

In one lineA mortgage-style loan with fixed monthly repayments, to acquire Bitcoin for long-term BTC stackers.

Role
CEO & Co-founder
When
May 2025 – Jun 2026
Where
Base (Coinbase L2)
Team
3 co-founders, 3 founding engineers, 1 designer, 1 marketer
3rdof 800+ teams at Base Batches 001
WinnerBase Batches 002 Start-up Track, top 10 of 750+
$50K+in Base Builder Grants
$30Kof Bitcoin bought through our DCA tool
  • Coinbase-sponsored audit, lined up
  • 500+ waitlist
  • Presented at Ethereum World’s Fair, Argentina
  • Invited to Base Camp

The Bitmor app: pick an amount and a term, then see the down payment and the fixed monthly payment.

01

Bitcoin lending only runs in one direction

Bitcoin lending serves people who already own BTC and want dollars.

Lending today
Your BTCbecomesDollars
Sold if the price drops
What stackers need
DollarsbecomesBitcoin you keep
Didn’t exist on-chain
Failure mode 1

Liquidation punishes conviction

On-chain lenders have force-sold 19,500+ BTC in crashes since 2021. Ledn liquidated ~1,300 loans in early 2026 alone.

Failure mode 2

Borrowing BTC is a bet against it

Borrow BTC and it doubles, and you owe twice as much. So only 3.9% of the BTC in DeFi is ever borrowed.

02

Lend like a mortgage, not a margin account

Two observations shaped the product.

The people accumulating Bitcoin are small, and they buy hardest in crashes

56.3M addresses hold under 1 BTC. The 0.1–1 BTC tier grew 2.9× faster in the 2021–22 bear market than in the bull run that followed.

Weekly addresses holding 0.1–1 BTC against the price, February 2021 to February 2026. Data: Newhedge.

Public companies already stack Bitcoin with debt that can’t force a sale

More than 70 do, from Strategy to Metaplanet. Strategy built 800,000+ BTC partly on convertible notes, and rode out the 2021–22 crash without a margin call.

03

Six product decisions, and what they cost

Dropping the price trigger meant rebuilding three things: where the lender’s protection comes from, how payments work, and how a loan gets created.

  1. Decision01

    Replace price-based liquidation with a PUT option per loan

    Every loan buys a Deribit PUT on its full position, struck near 73% of the starting price for the loan’s term. Instead of lenders absorbing crash losses, a $30B+ options market carries the risk.

    What it cost

    A premium of 1–6% of the BTC price, paid upfront. Rolling the PUT down recovers ~56% and escrowed BTC earns yield; savings return as promotional incentives.

  2. Decision02

    Liquidate only on a missed payment, and only as much as needed

    A falling price never closes a loan; a missed payment does. Even then, a micro-liquidation sells only enough BTC for that installment plus a fee. The loan unwinds only if the rest can’t cover the debt.

    What it cost

    Falling behind still costs BTC, one installment and one fee at a time: slower and smaller than a margin call, but not free.

  3. Decision03

    Fixed payments for the borrower, variable rates underneath

    The rate floats with pool utilisation between a 7% floor and a 15% ceiling, where lender money pours in. The installment is set at the ceiling and capped at what’s owed, so nobody overpays.

    What it cost

    Borrowers budget for 15%, not the live rate. In return the bill never changes, while DeFi rates swung from 1.85% to 24.6% in 18 months.

  4. Decision04

    Create the whole loan in one atomic transaction with a flash loan

    One transaction flash-borrows from Aave, buys the BTC, locks it as collateral, borrows USDC from our pool and repays Aave, in under 5 seconds. Without it, every loan would need twice the liquidity.

Decision 4, step by step. Illustrative amounts: 0.1 BTC at $70K with 30% down.
  1. Decision05

    Keep idle lender money earning, and price loans fairly

    Unlent USDC earns the base rate in Aave V3. Rates use virtual utilisation, borrowed ÷ (pool + Aave position), so parked money doesn’t inflate them. Past an 80% kink, rates climb steeply to pull in lenders.

  2. Decision06

    Non-custodial and permissionless by design

    Users only touch smart contracts; no Bitmor entity holds funds. Config changes wait behind a 1-day timelock guardians can cancel, multisigs need 2-of-3 or 3-of-5 signatures, and US persons are blocked at three layers.

Where the six decisions land against the alternatives

BitmorMortgageFiLooping on Aave or MorphoLedn B2X
RepaymentFixed monthlyFixed monthlyVariable rateAnytime during term
LiquidationOnly on missed payments, in partNone on price; whole position on defaultAround a 15% price dropMargin calls from about a 30% drop
Default risk in a crashHedged with optionsAbsorbed by lendersBorrower gets liquidatedBorrower gets liquidated
Effective leverage3.3×Up to 50×2.5–3.7×2×
CustodyNon-custodialNon-custodialNon-custodialCustodial
AccessPermissionlessPermissionlessPermissionlessKYC required
At the endYou own the BTCYou own the BTCPrice exposure onlyYou own the BTC

MortgageFi and Ledn terms are from their own sites as of November 2026. Looping figures are from our own analysis.

04

Proving it against every historical crash

Lenders won’t fund a pool that can’t sell on price without proof. I led the backtest; our quant co-founder built the PUT pricing and roll-down engine it runs on.

1,46412-month loans, one opened daily, April 2021 to March 2025
527K+daily observations on real BTC prices and Deribit volatility
70%+price drawdowns replayed, through LUNA, 3AC/Celsius and FTX
Lender coverage across 527,000+ days

How much protection each loan had against what the lender was owed. Below 1.0×, the lender loses money.

0days below 1.0×
Lender loses money
1.078×Worst single day: 3AC/Celsius, June 2022
1.418×Median of each loan’s lowest point
56%
of the PUT cost recovered by rolling it downmedian, approximate
68.5%
of entry months where the loan beat DCA after 1 year
89%
of entry months where the loan beat DCA after 5 years

For a borrower: at $71K spot, buying through Bitmor cost ~7.1% over spot all-in, with interest, hedge and fees, for the whole position on day one.

05

Go-to-market: fill both sides, in order

Borrowers and lenders have to arrive together, so I planned each side separately.

First

Borrowers

Four borrowers, mapped by capacity and urgency

High urgency · Low monthly capacity
First-coiners · 0.01–0.1 BTC

“I’ll never own a full coin”

Younger and earlier in their career. 0.01 to 0.1 BTC, from $210 down and about $166 a month, framed as a purchase.

High urgency · High monthly capacity
Accumulators · 1 BTC

“I’m accumulating too slowly”

Already stacking and wants a whole coin sooner. 1 BTC over 12 months: about $21,000 down, then roughly $4,300 a month.

Low urgency · Low monthly capacity
Not targeted

Low capacity, low urgency

Small budgets and no rush to buy. I chose not to target this segment and spent nothing acquiring it.

Low urgency · High monthly capacity
Evidence-seekers · content-led

“Show me the math”

Patient DCA buyers who want proof before they borrow. Reached through comparison content and the loan-vs-DCA backtest.

Start small, graduate up

Year one leads with small loans, interest-free for the first 358 borrowers (~$20K), to build a repayment record. Repaid borrowers graduate up, and the 1 BTC tier opens once that record exists.

Lifetime value per $1 spent acquiring the borrower
Break-even · 1×
0.5×
1.8×
5.1×
0.01 BTC loanLoses money alone, but starts the climb
0.1 BTC loanPays back almost twice over
1 BTC loanThe profit engine: ~$734 a borrower

A channel for every segment

$120K for year one: $93K on channels, ~$20K for the subsidy and $7K in reserve, aiming at 650 loans from ~2M impressions a month.

Planned channel spend, launch year$93K
ChannelSpendAccumulatorsFirst-coinersEvidence-seekers
SEO and AI searchComparison pages and AI answersAccumulatorsFirst-coinersEvidence-seekers
$28K
On-chain wallet adsWallets holding 0.05+ BTCAccumulatorsFirst-coiners
$21K
Social adsFans of River, Swan and StrikeAccumulatorsFirst-coiners
$21K
Paid KOLsTracked links, then a fee shareAccumulatorsFirst-coiners
$16K
PodcastsBitcoin and macro showsAccumulatorsEvidence-seekers
$5K
Educational tools“How long until 1 BTC?”First-coinersEvidence-seekers
$2K
RedditOrganic backtest threadsAccumulatorsFirst-coiners
$0

Testing it before launch

Loans needed a mainnet launch, so we tested the channels on what was already live.

  1. Jun 2025 – Mar 2026Worked

    Reddit

    Data posts in r/Bitcoin and r/CryptoCurrency built on our loan-vs-DCA backtests, plus daily replies.

    250K–500Kimpressions a post

    An early pitch got roasted, so we led with data. Cold DMs read as scams.

  2. Oct 2025Worked

    A free DCA app

    A public-good DCA app on Base, live before loans, to reach stackers early.

    5,000+transactions before loans existed

    Its users were our first audience for loans.

  3. From Nov 2025Worked

    The Base App

    Listed under “Trading must-haves” for months, and trended #3 in Finance.

    ~20%of visiting users converted
  4. Nov 2025Wrong audience

    Creator campaigns

    A Base creator contest, then a podcast and clipping campaign with Scribble.

    <50waitlist sign-ups from $1,000 and ~300K impressions on X

    We needed channels that reach tokenized-BTC holders.

  5. Feb – Mar 2026Best value

    On-chain ads

    Spindl ads in Coinbase Wallet, Bitget Wallet, LayerHub and Jumper, aimed at Dune-segmented wallets.

    200+waitlist sign-ups from $200

    Bid high on a narrow set of prime-target wallets, and low on broad audiences.

Cost per waitlist sign-up
~$1On-chain ads aimed at Bitcoin holders
$20+Creator campaigns

Reach was easy; the right audience wasn’t. Those sign-ups, with our DCA users, were to be the first interest-free borrowers.

Then

Lenders

Seed the pool first, earn trust, then open up

1 · Seed

Our money first

$100K of our own capital funds the first loans, so lenders judge a real track record.

2 · Target

Go where the money is

Of 69,175 lender wallets, $100K+ wallets held 96% of capital, at a median rate below T-bills.

3 · Reward

Rewards that switch off

Treasury rewards pay only above 90% utilisation, then stop. Year-one cost: $21K–146K.

Partners

We were in talks with two Base-ecosystem partners, one for each side of the market.

BTC yield

AARC

AARC’s BTCY vault, built on Sygnum Bank’s BTC Alpha Fund, would earn ~5% on the collateral, nearly covering the interest.

Liquidity

Hydrex

Hydrex would co-fund liquidity campaigns and spread Bitmor across Base, giving lenders a channel beyond our own outreach.

After year one
  1. 1

    First 1,000 users

    Convert our own DCA users, then target on-chain tokenized-BTC holders and CeFi borrowers such as Ledn’s.

  2. 2

    Scale

    Integrate with centralised exchanges and with wallets such as Coinbase and MetaMask, to reach users beyond our app.

  3. 3

    Institutions

    Partner with banks and custodians, and offer the financing rails to them as a white-label product.

06

What I owned

Our CTO led the contracts and our quant built the options engine. I owned everything else.

  1. 01

    Product

    User interviews and buyer personasPRDs for loans, repayments and the BTC vaultBrand identity with our designer: the process and the brand bibleHotjar reviews of where testers got stuck

  2. 02

    Protocol

    Specs for the lending pool, BTC vault and options hedgeRules for repayments and missed paymentsSecurity review by FailSafe: the post and case studyA Coinbase-sponsored audit, lined up for mainnet

  3. 03

    Economics

    Financial model and fee scheduleInvestor data roomA 1.07% take rate on loans, ~4× Aave’sThe 1,464-loan backtest

  4. 04

    Go-to-market

    Borrower segments and offersInterest-free loans for the first 358 borrowersLender rewards that kick in when the pool runs lowPre-launch tests on Reddit, creators and on-chain ads

  5. 05

    Partnerships

    AARC for yield on BTC collateralHydrex for lender liquidityCitrea and Starknet, two Bitcoin L2sP2P.me for fiat on-rampsThe Base team, who introduced us to Spindl

  6. 06

    Company

    Hiring the founding team and advisorsSetting up the companyPitching to funds, accelerators and angel investors

07

How it ended

We stopped building in June 2026. We couldn’t raise the capital a lending protocol needs before its first loan.

~$100Kof our own capital to seed the lending pool
$750Kthe pre-seed round we planned, to cover 18 months

It also needed an entity to run the options desk, and money for a second audit if the sponsored one found a critical bug. The grants and Base Batches results proved the idea was worth building; they couldn’t fund a balance sheet.

08

What I’d do differently

01Line up the market timing with the fundraise

What happened

Our pitch leaned on downturns, when small holders accumulate fastest. That’s also when investors hold back. The idea was strongest when it was hardest to fund.

Next time

Treat the funding climate as a product constraint from day one, with a cheaper version ready to launch if capital isn’t there.

02Cut scope to what the first loan needs

What happened

We spent 9 weeks on the BTC yield vault. It improves the borrower’s economics, but nobody needs it for a first loan.

Next time

Launch smaller: a capped pool on the $100K seed, a single 0.1 BTC tier and the PUT hedge, then raise on real repayments, not a backtest.